linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PCI: also read revision ID for sparc64, ppc, read class at the same time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1181474643.8351.1.camel@concordia.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date:	Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:24:03 +1000
From:	Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To:	Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	gregkh@...e.de, grundler@...isc-linux.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: also read revision ID for sparc64, ppc, read
	class at the same time

On Sat, 2007-06-09 at 13:12 -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
> Since the PCI bus class and revision are in the same dword, we
> can fill in both in the same read.
> 
> Other non-x86 arches use different methods to fill in these values,
> make sure to adjust those too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...el.com>
> ---
> 
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c |    2 ++
>  arch/sparc64/kernel/pci.c    |    1 +
>  drivers/pci/probe.c          |    4 +---
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> index 249cca2..b2c55ca 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c
> @@ -367,8 +367,10 @@ struct pci_dev *of_create_pci_dev(struct device_node *node,
>  	sprintf(pci_name(dev), "%04x:%02x:%02x.%d", pci_domain_nr(bus),
>  		dev->bus->number, PCI_SLOT(devfn), PCI_FUNC(devfn));
>  	dev->class = get_int_prop(node, "class-code", 0);
> +	dev->revision = get_int_prop(node, "revision-id", 0);

It's not clear to me in the spec if nodes are required to have the
"revision-id" property. I guess 0 is a safe default though.

cheers

-- 
Michael Ellerman
OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab

wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au
phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183)

We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors,
we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)