linux-kernel - Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <466D08AE.6090309@netone.net.tr>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jun 2007 11:32:46 +0300
From:	Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	debian developer <debiandev@...il.com>,
	"david@...g.hm" <david@...g.hm>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Tarkan Erimer <tarkan@...one.net.tr> wrote:
>
>   
>> [...] Just, I asked simple question and included a simple example in 
>> it. [...]
>>     
>
> actually, what you said was this:
>
> " I hope we should upgrade to GPLv3 and Sun should "Dual License"
>   the OpenSolaris via GPLv3 (or at least,GPLv3 should be CDDL
>   compatible.). "
>   
Why don't you include the last sentence I wrote: "So,we should have more 
fruits (like ZFS,DTrace etc.) ;-) "
So, that's why I said it. Because, as all the time, we did it: Importing 
and exporting codes to/from different open source projects.

> and to that the answer was:
>
> " The OpenSolaris community has already stated that they do not want to
>   accept GPLv3 [...] "
>
> in other words: your hypothetical is false today. You called us to do a 
> specific action, but why did you then include a factually false 
> 'example' to underline that point of yours? Or if you simply did not 
> know about the OpenSolaris community's position beforehand, why dont you 
> just admit that and withdraw from that line of argument gracefully?
>
> 	Ingo
>   

As I mentioned in my previous posts: This is **not** in the hands of the 
"OpenSolaris Community" to make and apply such decision. Sun itself 
**will decide** it. Also, there are strong indications that Sun is very 
interested to make "OpenSolaris" at least "Dual-Licensed" with GPLv3.

Regards,

Tarkan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/