[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20070620183605.GF24544@erda.amd.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 20:36:05 +0200
From: "Robert Richter" <robert.richter@....com>
To: "David Rientjes" <rientjes@...gle.com>
cc: "Stephane Eranian" <eranian@....hp.com>,
"Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 1/8] 2.6.22-rc3 perfmon2 : IBS implementation for
AMD64
David,
thanks for your comments.
On 15.06.07 11:54:24, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Robert Richter wrote:
>
> > Index: linux-2.6.22-rc3/arch/i386/perfmon/perfmon.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.22-rc3.orig/arch/i386/perfmon/perfmon.c
> > +++ linux-2.6.22-rc3/arch/i386/perfmon/perfmon.c
> > @@ -1059,6 +1059,7 @@ char *pfm_arch_get_pmu_module_name(void)
> > goto try_arch;
> > }
> > case 15:
> > + case 16:
> > /* All Opteron processors */
> > if (cpu_data->x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD)
> > return "perfmon_k8";
>
> Constants like these should be #define'd in a header file but, admittedly,
> it might become a rather intrusive change at this point for the above
> case.
All current x86 CPU detection code in the kernel is using hard coded
numbers. Introducing new defines for family and model numbers would
not be suitable here.
Thanks,
-Robert
--
AMD Saxony, Dresden, Germany
Operating System Research Center
email: robert.richter@....com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists