linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] writeback: 3-queue based writeback schedule

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20070810170534.GA5137@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Date:	Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:05:34 +0800
From:	Fengguang Wu <wfg@...l.ustc.edu.cn>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...l.org>, Ken Chen <kenchen@...gle.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] writeback: 3-queue based writeback schedule

On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:47:15AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> In fact s_more_io is no longer necessary. We end up with a priority

Ah sorry, s_more_io is still needed to keep the time-ordering. I was
thinking of schedule fairness, in which sense only one cyclic list
will be sufficient.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/