[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200710120053.20202.rc.poison@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:53:19 +0200
From: poison <rc.poison@...il.com>
To: Helmut Toplizer <bgrpt@...litzer.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: linux-2.6.23 - acting funny
Hi =)
On Thursday 11 October 2007, Helmut Toplizer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I had similar behavior in the kernel releases since I can think of.
It doesn't happen before 2.6.23.
> (You may find some reports about at
> http://marc.info/?a=113508574400006&r=1&w=2)
>
> Maybe your problem is similar.
>
> Here's what have been found out:
> Plugin of ehci devices causes some strange DMA thing
> which causes delays because of the CPU HLT instruction.
> (DMA are handled with delays on HLT)
>
> Possible fixes:
> 1) Kernel parameter: idle=poll
> Disables HLT and causes heat up and noise from the cpu
$ cat /proc/cmdline
root=/dev/sdb1 ro vga=794 idle=poll
Same story.
If I start:
$ while true; do echo test > /dev/null; done
... the transfer rate goes up.
>
> 2) Don't insert EHCI-USB devices
Still reproducable with all USB devices except keyboard+mouse removed, ehci
deselcted in kernel config and booting with idle=poll.
>
> 3) Patch: attached, try out at your own risk.
> you need to add a kernel-boot parameter "disableviahlt"
> (You've got a via-chipset, right?)
>
> Please report back to me if 1/2 works or to linux-ide if the patch works.
No VIA chip in sight. Mainboard is an Intel 975XBX2 and hard disks are
connected to the ICH7 SATA Controller, so I don't think the patch will help
me ^^
lspci attached.
Also the transfer rate didn't degrade too much for copying directly from
reiserfs to reiserfs and not using encfs:
dd if=/mnt/.backup/2CpGkrxvz6wgA0b0xloz8PavzMLrMymOgi9 of=/mnt/.tdata/test
1033+0 records in
1033+0 records out
1083179008 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 16.9303 s, 64.0 MB/s
Plus the transfer rate doesn't increase if I start a CPU hog while copying
between reiserfs.
So it looks more to me like theres a bad interaction between the new
scheduler, fuse and encfs ...
> Thanks
>
> Helmut
Thanks for your reply ^^
View attachment "lspci" of type "text/plain" (18793 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists