| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <476AF8EF.3060407@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2007 18:21:19 -0500 From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@...hat.com> To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...ey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, "Chumbalkar, Nagananda" <Nagananda.Chumbalkar@...com> Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 0/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG] Greg KH wrote: > > Sure, I realize this, but it solves the problem in one way for broken > hardware, such that it at least allows it to work, right? It also > provides a better incentive for the manufacturer to fix their bios, > which as you are on-site at HP, it would seem odd that they would just > not do that instead of trying to work around this in the kernel... > > thanks, > > greg k-h I don't think that many OEMs have that much control over the BIOS in their "value lines". :) And the MMCONFIG problem with enterprise systems and workstations, where we do control the BIOS (for the most part), is due to known bugs in certain versions of certain chipsets, HT1000, AMD8132, among them, not the BIOS. Anyway, we are devising better ways to deal with these anomalies than blacklists and telling customers to use "pci=nommconf" And we're bringing them to the community for discussion, improvement, and, we hope, acceptance. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists