[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1200683183.25782.15.camel@cinder.waste.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 13:06:23 -0600
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
daniel.ritz-ml@...ssonline.ch, randy.dunlap@...cle.com,
jeff@...zik.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] printk: implement printk_header() and merging printk
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 11:44 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 12:41:08PM -0600, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 10:00 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > And mprintk the following.
> > >
> > > code:
> > > DEFINE_MPRINTK(mp, 2 * 80);
> > >
> > > mprintk_set_header(&mp, KERN_INFO "ata%u.%2u: ", 1, 0);
> > > mprintk_push(&mp, "ATA %d", 7);
> > > mprintk_push(&mp, ", %u sectors\n", 1024);
> > > mprintk(&mp, "everything seems dandy\n");
> >
> > I prefer Matthew Wilcox's stringbuf approach which does proper memory
> > management and isn't specific to printk:
> >
> > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0710.3/0517.html
>
> Do you have any strong feelings whether we should merge my stringbufs or
> rusty's version? I have no particular preference.
My vague recollection was that I preferred Rusty's. But it's been a
while.
--
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists