[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200801191459.49735.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 14:59:49 +1100
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
Ash Willis <ashwillis@...grammer.net>,
linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] Makes lguest's irq handler typesafe
On Saturday 19 January 2008 12:44:52 Tejun Heo wrote:
> Tejun Heo wrote:
> > so I think the question is "do we want to change all callbacks to
> > take native pointer type instead of void pointer?".
>
> Lemme clarity myself a bit. I'm not saying that we should convert all
> at once or literally every callback should be converted. What I'm
> saying is whether we're headed that way in general and converting big
> ones - timer for example - and getting the conversion agreed upon should
> be enough to set the norm.
Hi Tejun
There are three possibilities: (1) force everyone to use void *, (2) force
everyone to be type-correct, (3) allow both with some tricks. Currently
we're on (1). For kthread, with only dozens of users, I chose (2) (very
simple, easy to understand). I think for widespread things like timer and
interrupt handlers, I think (3) is the right way to go.
I wanted to get this patch out there and see what the reaction was. I can
do timers next, if that's going to add fuel to the discussion.
Thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists