[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200802201324.37519.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:24:36 -0800
From: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To: Andre Tomt <andre@...t.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: USB OOPS 2.6.25-rc2-git1
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Andre Tomt wrote:
> ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: IAA watchdog, lost IAA: status 8029 cmd 10021
> ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: IAA watchdog, lost IAA: status 8029 cmd 10021
> ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: IAA watchdog, lost IAA: status 8029 cmd 10021
> ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: IAA watchdog, lost IAA: status 8029 cmd 10021
> ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: IAA watchdog, lost IAA: status 8029 cmd 10021
> ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: IAA watchdog, lost IAA: status 8028 cmd 10021
> ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: IAA watchdog, lost IAA: status 8028 cmd 10021
> ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: IAA watchdog, lost IAA: status 8028 cmd 10021
> ehci_hcd 0000:00:1d.7: IAA watchdog, lost IAA: status 8029 cmd 10021
... etc.
OK, the relevant bits are:
status 0001 == some transaction completed normally (ignored here)
status 0020 == IAA set, which should have triggered an IRQ
command 0040 == IAAD clear, meaning IAA should have triggered
Meaning the hardware is misbehaving in a "traditional" way, one
that the watchdog is supposed to catch: IAA set, but no IRQ.
If you see any "IAA" messages *other* than those, please report
them ASAP. They'll indicate "nontraditional" misbehavior.
> It has not crashed yet with the patch though.
It seems that one of the tweks in this patch made the watchdog
act better than before. So unless I hear from you (before the
start of next week) that some other message appears, or that your
oops re-appears, I'll submit some version of this patch for RC3.
And if you're up for it, I may have another patch for you
to try on top of this one ... I had an idea about IRQ trigger
modes that might be causing this problem.
- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists