[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080306113729.GA18403@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:37:29 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org>
Cc: Pawel Plociennik <paplociennik@...il.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] chroot= as a new kernel parameter
* Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org> wrote:
> > But given an existing initrd (which might have come from the distro,
> > etc.) i prefer adding boot options instead of modifying the initrd.
>
> I assume this is so you have have /distro1 /distro2 and use your boot
> option to (help) select which one you boot into?
while i have no personal use for chroot=, i generally test distros that
way, yes - and i try to keep them as unmodified as possible.
"Use the initrd as an extended boot commandline" is a poor answer IMO.
_Everything_ we do on the boot commandline that affects user-space can
be done in an initrd in theory - but still we have hundreds of boot
options.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists