lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080306113729.GA18403@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:37:29 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org>
Cc:	Pawel Plociennik <paplociennik@...il.com>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.24] chroot= as a new kernel parameter


* Chris Wedgwood <cw@...f.org> wrote:

> > But given an existing initrd (which might have come from the distro, 
> > etc.) i prefer adding boot options instead of modifying the initrd.
> 
> I assume this is so you have have /distro1 /distro2 and use your boot
> option to (help) select which one you boot into?

while i have no personal use for chroot=, i generally test distros that 
way, yes - and i try to keep them as unmodified as possible.

"Use the initrd as an extended boot commandline" is a poor answer IMO. 

_Everything_ we do on the boot commandline that affects user-space can 
be done in an initrd in theory - but still we have hundreds of boot 
options.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ