[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87ve3bi0s3.fsf@basil.nowhere.org>
Date: 25 Mar 2008 10:57:32 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
"Van De Ven, Arjan" <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Fixing the main programmer thinko with the device model
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com> writes:
>
> That's true, but irrelevant (and also soon to be untrue if we get rid of
> the scsi_device class as you and Kay keep requesting). The two calls
> release references on the actual embedded generic device, it's nothing
> to do with entangled lifetime rules.
<heretic thought>Has anybody ever considered just doing away with
the problematic and bug prone and tricky reference counts for kobjects
and switch to a simple garbage collector for them?
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists