[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e9c3a7c20804141645k6bdb075ax25e57f41e45e5105@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 16:45:37 -0700
From: "Dan Williams" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: "Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>
Cc: "Adrian Bunk" <bunk@...nel.org>,
"Sebastian Siewior" <linux-crypto@...breakpoint.cc>,
hskinnemoen@...el.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shannon.nelson@...el.com
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] add include/asm-avr32/xor.h
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com> wrote:
> > "arches" did not have to go through and figure out the fun little stub
> > file for xor.h. Adrian already made your "life easier".
>
> actually he didnt. he posted a fix for avr32. i dont care about
> avr32, i'm a blackfin guy. he also wouldnt have had to do anything at
> all if everything was handled with indirection in linux/xor.h.
>
> your point also is irrelevant in the case of new architectures. poor
> microblaze for example.
>
Don't get me wrong I see the pain-reducing-value in codifying all the
features that have architecture specific aspects with HAVE_* config
variables. But in this case I think a 6 line patch per new arch gets
the immediate job done.
Regards,
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists