[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1Jp6U9-0004n5-0N@pomaz-ex.szeredi.hu>
Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2008 20:47:57 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: miklos@...redi.hu, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
ezk@...sunysb.edu, mhalcrow@...ibm.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch 00/13] vfs: add helpers to check r/o bind mounts
> > Why are those so important? Yes, if we have multiple vfs_() calls,
> > surround them with an extra want/drop pair. We do already do multiple
> > overlapping want/drop pairs with O_TRUNC and O_CREAT (AFAIR).
>
> The one that I remember is the pair that we take for O_CREAT and the
> nameidata_to_filp() in do_filp_open() that we do on it after the
> creation and hold while the file is open.
>
> The only reason for this one is that we want to shut down a potential
> race that would allow the file to be created, then still return a -EROFS
> because someone did a r/w->r/o transition between the create an the
> nameidata_to_filp().
>
> We could pass some information into nameidata_to_filp()->__dentry_open()
> telling it that we already have a write and it doesn't need to take one,
> but I think having the two nested writes is cleaner.
Agreed.
> Is that the case you're thinking of?
Yes. And the same thing is done a little below for similar reasons
around may_open() which does truncation.
Miklos
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists