[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080429152249.GB11329@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 08:22:49 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: SL Baur <steve@...acs.org>
Cc: "gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, hpa@...or.com, htejun@...il.com,
kay.sievers@...y.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lkml@....ca,
neilb@...e.de
Subject: Re: patch
sysfs-add-sys-dev-char-block-to-lookup-sysfs-path-by-major-minor.pat
ch added to gregkh-2.6 tree
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:48:11AM -0700, SL Baur wrote:
> On 4/28/08, gregkh@...e.de <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> >
> > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> >
> > Subject: sysfs: add /sys/dev/{char,block} to lookup sysfs path by major:minor
> >
> > to my gregkh-2.6 tree. Its filename is
> >
> > sysfs-add-sys-dev-char-block-to-lookup-sysfs-path-by-major-minor.patch
>
> > + char devt_str[15];
> > +
> > + if (kobj) {
> > + format_dev_t(devt_str, dev->devt);
>
> This part is ugly, but is not the fault of the patch. The ill-
> considered interface for `format_dev_t' is something that probably
> noone wants to fix.
Why not? Patches are always welcome, it's not like that function is
used in that many different places, should be a simple change...
> Otherwise, still OK with me.
>
> Reviewed-by: SL Baur <steve@...acs.org>
>
> (Is Reviewed-by not sticky?)
Yes, it is, I'll add it to my version of the patch.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists