[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080430160354.29dfe255@gaivota>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:03:54 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
To: Patrick Boettcher <patrick.boettcher@...y.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-dvb-maintainer@...uxtv.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
video4linux-list@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [v4l-dvb-maintainer] [GIT PATCHES] V4L/DVB updates and fixes
for 2.6.26
Hi Patrick
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:02:43 +0200 (CEST)
Patrick Boettcher <patrick.boettcher@...y.de> wrote:
> Hi Mauro,
>
> sorry to say that now and not earlier, but:
>
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2008, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > .../{dvb/frontends => common/tuners}/mt2266.c | 0
> > .../{dvb/frontends => common/tuners}/mt2266.h | 4 +-
>
> The mt2266 is a zero-IF (baseband) tuner. I think there is no analog
> decoder for this kind of tuners.
Ah, ok. I'm not 100% sure, but I think some chips, like cx88 could theoretically
support a baseband tuner. But you're right: there's no known board using mt2266.
> Maybe the move was not necessary, but maybe all tuners should go to
> common.
Good point.
It seems easier to maintain if we should move all terrestrial/cable [1]
(analog and/or digital) tuners into common/tuners.
Cheers,
Mauro
[1] I don't see any technical sense of moving satellite tuners, except for
having just one place for all tuners, or if there are some tendency of hybrid
satellite/terrestrial tuners.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists