[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m1sktm7ght.fsf@frodo.ebiederm.org>
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 23:35:42 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Dhaval Giani" <dhaval@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Mike Travis" <travis@....com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: Restore the proper NR_IRQS define so larger systems work.
"Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> writes:
> what should xen pv 64 get for NR_IRQS?
Xen pv 64 will work at least as well with a larger definition for
NR_IRQS as it will work with a smaller definition, and since
NR_VECTORS is 256 we always have more irqs with the 32bit definition
we were mistakenly using.
Xen has 1024 event channels so I expect 1024 would the nice number to
provide there.
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists