linux-kernel - Re: worth separating serial from parallel ATA kernel options?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 8 Aug 2008 17:26:29 +0100
From:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: worth separating serial from parallel ATA kernel options?

On Fri, 8 Aug 2008 12:32:23 -0400 (EDT)
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca> wrote:

> 
>   asked from a position of appalling ignorance, but would it be more
> organized to be able to select serial ATA functionality separately
> from parallel ATA? 

The correct fix is to remove the (experimental) from the Parallel ATA
drivers Kconfig

For the rest of the menu the list is SATA first, then PATA (and PATA is
roughly alphabetic but both want a tidy)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/