linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Add missing macro argument for devm_release

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080905222320.36eb3bfa.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 5 Sep 2008 22:23:20 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add missing macro argument for devm_release_* family

On Sat, 06 Sep 2008 08:18:41 +0300 (EEST) Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com> wrote:

> From: "ext Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add missing macro argument for devm_release_* family
> Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2008 18:52:54 -0700
> 
> > On Sat,  6 Sep 2008 04:00:23 +0300 Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > From: ext Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com>
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Hiroshi DOYU <Hiroshi.DOYU@...ia.com>
> > > ---
> > >  include/linux/ioport.h |    4 ++--
> > >  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
> > > index 22d2115..c813c63 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/ioport.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
> > > @@ -158,9 +158,9 @@ extern struct resource * __devm_request_region(struct device *dev,
> > >  				struct resource *parent, resource_size_t start,
> > >  				resource_size_t n, const char *name);
> > >  
> > > -#define devm_release_region(start,n) \
> > > +#define devm_release_region(dev,start,n) \
> > >  	__devm_release_region(dev, &ioport_resource, (start), (n))
> > > -#define devm_release_mem_region(start,n) \
> > > +#define devm_release_mem_region(dev,start,n) \
> > >  	__devm_release_region(dev, &iomem_resource, (start), (n))
> > >  
> > >  extern void __devm_release_region(struct device *dev, struct resource *parent,
> > 
> > um, OK.
> > 
> > But none of these things appear to have any callers anywhere.  Why
> > don't we just delete it all?
> 
> Not sure for others, but at least, I am using this in my developing
> driver;)

yeah, I was just trolling ;)

I queued this fix for 2.6.27.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/