[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200809100236.04016.j@jannau.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 02:36:03 +0200
From: Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Jarod Wilson <jwilson@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Bartelmus <lirc@...telmus.de>,
Janne Grunau <j@...nau.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/18] lirc driver for 2nd-gen and later Media Center Ed. USB IR transceivers
On Wednesday 10 September 2008 01:30:57 Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 00:05:49 -0400
>
> Jarod Wilson <jwilson@...hat.com> wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * LIRC driver for Philips eHome USB Infrared Transceiver
> > + * and the Microsoft MCE 2005 Remote Control
> > + *
> > + * (C) by Martin A. Blatter <martin_a_blatter@...oo.com>
> > + *
> > + * Transmitter support and reception code cleanup.
> > + * (C) by Daniel Melander <lirc@...idae.se>
>
> As I understand it, proper assertions of copyright need the word
> "copyright" and a year; the "(C)" trigraph doesn't have any legal
> meaning.
Depends on the country. I won't touch copyright notices or attributions.
> > + * This driver will only work reliably with kernel version 2.6.10
> > + * or higher, probably because of differences in USB device
> > enumeration + * in the kernel code. Device initialization fails
> > most of the time + * with earlier kernel versions.
>
> My guess is that this will not be a major impediment to mainline
> inclusion; this comment can probably go.
Already removed.
> > +/* lock irctl structure */
> > +#define IRLOCK mutex_lock(&ir->lock)
> > +#define IRUNLOCK mutex_unlock(&ir->lock)
>
> Might I request that these go away? They can only obfuscate the
> code.
yes, I will manually expand similar macros in the other drivers too.
> Also, set_use_inc() is returning a normal zero-or-negative-error
> status to an outside caller. It shouldn't return a locally-defined
> symbol like SUCCESS. I'd just use "return 0;".
fixed
> > +#ifdef MODULE
> > +static int __init usb_remote_init(void)
> > +{
>
> I'm curious: you don't need to initialize if not compiled as a
> module?
Already fixed in all drivers, relict from out of tree lirc.
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + printk(KERN_INFO "\n");
> > + printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME ": " DRIVER_DESC " " DRIVER_VERSION
> > "\n"); + printk(KERN_INFO DRIVER_NAME ": " DRIVER_AUTHOR "\n");
> > + dprintk(DRIVER_NAME ": debug mode enabled\n");
> > +
> > + request_module("lirc_dev");
>
> You're calling functions from lirc_dev.c, so modprobe will not load
> this module until lirc_dev is already there. There's no point in
> trying to load it explicitly with request_module().
True, request_module("lirc_dev"); removed from all drivers.
> > + i = usb_register(&usb_remote_driver);
> > + if (i < 0) {
> > + printk(DRIVER_NAME ": usb register failed, result = %d\n", i);
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return SUCCESS;
> > +}
>
> "return 0;" please.
fixed for all drivers
Janne
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists