[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080923083915.GS22550@infomag.infomag.iguana.be>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:39:15 +0200
From: Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <me@...ipebalbi.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"George G. Davis" <gdavis@...sta.com>, Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] watchdog: sync linux-omap changes
Hi Russell,
> It's unused, but it's a minor point, something that shouldn't stand
> in the way of it going into the watchdog tree. It doesn't cause a
> build error and doesn't cause malfunction. It's just a little untidy
> and can be addressed separately.
We will need to address it later then. I just added the patches to the
linux-2.6-watchdog-mm tree.
> + omap_wdt_set_timeout(wdev);
> + omap_wdt_enable(wdev);
> spin_unlock(&wdt_lock);
> +
> + omap_wdt_ping(wdev);
>
> which is moving omap_wdt_ping() outside of the spin lock, which I
> doubt actually causes any problem in real life on OMAP platforms.
> Granted that theoretically and logically it's wrong.
And since this is indeed wrong, I changed this back.
Kind regards,
Wim.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists