[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20081013054119.7f360ee1@extreme>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 05:41:19 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
Cc: ben@...tec.co.uk, s.hauer@...gutronix.de, jeff@...zik.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Javier Herrero <jherrero@...istemas.es>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] netdev: DM9000: Added typecasting to supress some
warnings on Blackfin
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 17:10:09 +0800
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Javier Herrero <jherrero@...istemas.es>
>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Herrero <jherrero@...istemas.es>
> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/dm9000.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dm9000.c b/drivers/net/dm9000.c
> index f42c23f..c4737ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dm9000.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dm9000.c
> @@ -188,35 +188,35 @@ iow(board_info_t * db, int reg, int value)
>
> static void dm9000_outblk_8bit(void __iomem *reg, void *data, int count)
> {
> - writesb(reg, data, count);
> + writesb((int)reg, data, count);
> }
You lose the sparse checking for misuse by doing this.
Why not this instead?
--- a/drivers/net/dm9000.c 2008-10-13 05:29:15.000000000 -0700
+++ b/drivers/net/dm9000.c 2008-10-13 05:40:13.000000000 -0700
@@ -47,14 +47,6 @@
#define CARDNAME "dm9000"
#define DRV_VERSION "1.31"
-#ifdef CONFIG_BLACKFIN
-#define readsb insb
-#define readsw insw
-#define readsl insl
-#define writesb outsb
-#define writesw outsw
-#define writesl outsl
-#endif
/*
* Transmit timeout, default 5 seconds.
@@ -185,7 +177,40 @@ iow(board_info_t * db, int reg, int valu
}
/* routines for sending block to chip */
+#ifdef CONFIG_BLACKFIN
+static void dm9000_outblk_8bit(void __iomem *reg, void *data, int count)
+{
+ outsb((unsigned long)reg, data, count);
+}
+static void dm9000_outblk_16bit(void __iomem *reg, void *data, int count)
+{
+ outsw((unsigned long)reg, data, (count+1) >> 1);
+}
+
+static void dm9000_outblk_32bit(void __iomem *reg, void *data, int count)
+{
+ outsl((unsigned long)reg, data, (count+3) >> 2);
+}
+
+/* input block from chip to memory */
+
+static void dm9000_inblk_8bit(void __iomem *reg, void *data, int count)
+{
+ insb((unsigned long)reg, data, count);
+}
+
+
+static void dm9000_inblk_16bit(void __iomem *reg, void *data, int count)
+{
+ insw((unsigned long)reg, data, (count+1) >> 1);
+}
+
+static void dm9000_inblk_32bit(void __iomem *reg, void *data, int count)
+{
+ insl((unsigned long)reg, data, (count+3) >> 2);
+}
+#else
static void dm9000_outblk_8bit(void __iomem *reg, void *data, int count)
{
writesb(reg, data, count);
@@ -218,6 +243,7 @@ static void dm9000_inblk_32bit(void __io
{
readsl(reg, data, (count+3) >> 2);
}
+#endif
/* dump block from chip to null */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists