[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c62985530811260522s359bd466j83cc99050d5a304a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:22:17 +0100
From: "Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: "Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing/function-return-tracer: set a more human readable output
2008/11/26 Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>:
> I'd suggest just looking at how those are implemented, and use your own.
> One note, the latency tracer looks at the next entry, even if it is on
> another CPU. This is incorrect, and will definitely be incorrect for you.
> Just use the ring_buffer_iter_peek, that will get you what you want. Well,
> for leaf functions.
>
> -- Steve
>
>
Ok, thanks for your tips!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists