[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0811261430120.3325@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 14:32:13 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, eranian@...glemail.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu, x86@...nel.org, eranian@...il.com
Subject: Re: [patch 05/24] perfmon: X86 generic code (x86)
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andi,
>
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:33:09 +0100 Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> >
> > > + * x86 does not need extra alignment requirements for the sampling buffer
> > > + */
> > > +#define PFM_ARCH_SMPL_ALIGN_SIZE 0
> > > +
> > > +asmlinkage void pmu_interrupt(void);
> > > +
> > > +static inline void pfm_arch_bv_copy(u64 *a, u64 *b, int nbits)
> >
> > All these bitmap wrappers just seem like unnecessary obfuscation.
> > Could you just drop them and call the standard functions directly?
>
> These were added after comments from the PowerPC maintainer since how the
> bitmaps are accessed needs to be arch specific.
Just because perfmon uses u64 for bitfields instead of unsigned
long, therefor it breaks on BE32 machines.
I have not yet found a good reason why it needs to use u64 instead of
using what's there already.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists