linux-kernel - unified percpu stuff

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <497E5F76.10301@goop.org>
Date:	Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:12:22 -0800
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: unified percpu stuff

I'm really pleased to see the unified percpu stuff in the kernel, but 
unfortunately its breaking Xen at the moment. 

It looks like this is just a matter of initializing %gs properly in 
xen_start_kernel.  Is there any problem with me doing a load_gs_base(0) 
somewhere early in xen_start_kernel (arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c)?  Is the 
initial percpu are and offset for cpu0 all set up?  Do I need to make it 
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP?

Do I need to do anything for 32-bit? (I haven't tested that yet.)

Thanks,
    J

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/