[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <497E8AD4.7030702@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:17:24 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: unified percpu stuff
Hello,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> I'm really pleased to see the unified percpu stuff in the kernel, but
> unfortunately its breaking Xen at the moment.
> It looks like this is just a matter of initializing %gs properly in
> xen_start_kernel. Is there any problem with me doing a load_gs_base(0)
> somewhere early in xen_start_kernel (arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c)?
No, not at all. Patches welcome. :-)
> Is the initial percpu are and offset for cpu0 all set up? Do I need
> to make it #ifdef CONFIG_SMP?
>
> Do I need to do anything for 32-bit? (I haven't tested that yet.)
The current tj-percpu[1] contains Brian's commit which consolidates
load_gs_base() into switch_to_new_gdt(), so you'll either need to call
it instead or call wrmsrl() or loadsegment() directly if that doesn't
fit the bill (but I think it will).
The initial offset is different between 32 and 64. Please take a look
at BOOT_PERCPU_OFFSET definition in setup_percpu.c.
Thanks.
--
tejun
[1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tj/misc.git tj-percpu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists