linux-kernel - [PATCH] sched_rt: don't use first_cpu on cpumask created with cpumask

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200901312321.25344.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:21:24 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH] sched_rt: don't use first_cpu on cpumask created with cpumask_and.

Ingo, please apply to tip/urgent.

cpumask_and() only initializes nr_cpu_ids bits, so the (deprecated)
first_cpu() might find one of those uninitialized bits if nr_cpu_ids
is less than NR_CPUS (as it can be for CONFIG_CPUMASK_OFFSTACK).

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
---
 kernel/sched_rt.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
--- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
@@ -968,8 +968,8 @@ static inline int pick_optimal_cpu(int t
 	if ((this_cpu != -1) && cpu_isset(this_cpu, *mask))
 		return this_cpu;
 
-	first = first_cpu(*mask);
-	if (first != NR_CPUS)
+	first = cpumask_first(mask);
+	if (first < nr_cpu_ids)
 		return first;
 
 	return -1;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/