[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1237968394.30175.12.camel@penberg-laptop>
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:06:34 +0200
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Hua Zhong <hzhong@...il.com>
Cc: 'Steven Rostedt' <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 'Ingo Molnar' <mingo@...e.hu>,
'Andrew Morton' <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
'Thomas Gleixner' <tglx@...utronix.de>,
'Peter Zijlstra' <peterz@...radead.org>,
'Roland McGrath' <roland@...hat.com>,
'Nick Piggin' <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
'Steven Rostedt' <srostedt@...hat.com>,
'Christoph Lameter' <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
'Matt Mackall' <mpm@...enic.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/5] mm: remove unlikly NULL from kfree
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 01:02 -0700, Hua Zhong wrote:
> > But those are _error handling paths_ (at least supposed to be). I
> > wonder which call-sites are responsible for this. Can frtrace help us
> > here?
>
> I am not sure why you call these error paths.
>
> I submitted the same patch two years ago, and you are still holding the same
> argument.
>
> http://www.archivum.info/linux.kernel/2006-04/msg06042.html
>
> Have you used likely profiler? These are real numbers. If you insist on
> calling them error paths then error paths are obviously the norm.
I am not denying the results, I am just saying that they don't make much
sense to me. Like I said, I would love to see the actual call-sites to
prove my argument wrong.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists