linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 35/58] move omap_wdt's probe function to .devinit.text

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090329181528.GA25077@pengutronix.de>
Date:	Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:15:28 +0200
From:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:	Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ana.be>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ia.com>,
	"George G. Davis" <gdavis@...sta.com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 35/58] move omap_wdt's probe function to .devinit.text

Hi Wim,

On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 08:09:12PM +0200, Wim Van Sebroeck wrote:
> Hi Uwe,
> 
> > A pointer to omap_wdt_probe is passed to the core via
> > platform_driver_register and so the function must not disappear when the
> > .init sections are discarded.  Otherwise (if also having HOTPLUG=y)
> > unbinding and binding a device to the driver via sysfs will result in an
> > oops as does a device being registered late.
> > 
> > An alternative to this patch is using platform_driver_probe instead of
> > platform_driver_register plus removing the pointer to the probe function
> > from the struct platform_driver.
> 
> Agree with the explanation, but ...
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
> > index 2f2ce74..c9c14dd 100644
> > --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
> > @@ -269,7 +269,7 @@ static const struct file_operations omap_wdt_fops = {
> >  	.release = omap_wdt_release,
> >  };
> >  
> > -static int __init omap_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +static int __devinit omap_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  {
> >  	struct resource *res, *mem;
> >  	struct omap_wdt_dev *wdev;
> 
> ...imho this would be the correct fix:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
> index aa5ad6e..f271385 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/omap_wdt.c
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static const struct file_operations omap_wdt_fops = {
>  	.release = omap_wdt_release,
>  };
>  
> -static int __init omap_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int __devinit omap_wdt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct resource *res, *mem;
>  	struct omap_wdt_dev *wdev;
> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static void omap_wdt_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		omap_wdt_disable(wdev);
>  }
>  
> -static int omap_wdt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int __devexit omap_wdt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct omap_wdt_dev *wdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>  	struct resource *res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> @@ -426,7 +426,7 @@ static int omap_wdt_resume(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  static struct platform_driver omap_wdt_driver = {
>  	.probe		= omap_wdt_probe,
> -	.remove		= omap_wdt_remove,
> +	.remove		= __devexit_p(omap_wdt_remove),
>  	.shutdown	= omap_wdt_shutdown,
>  	.suspend	= omap_wdt_suspend,
>  	.resume		= omap_wdt_resume,
Your change is OK, but only "my" part is an important fix.  With
omap_wdt_probe being defined with __init your kernel can oops.
omap_wdt_remove only occupies memory for too long if defined without
__devexit.  That's why I only fixed the first part (with the remove
functions on my todo list though).

Grüßle
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                              | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                    | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/