[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A03E579.8030201@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 10:55:37 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
CC: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] generic hypercall support
Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> Also it would be interesting to see the MMIO comparison with EPT/NPT,
> it probably sucks much less than what you're seeing.
>
Why would NPT improve mmio? If anything, it would be worse, since the
processor has to do the nested walk.
Of course, these are newer machines, so the absolute results as well as
the difference will be smaller.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists