[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090508103125.00121311@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 10:31:25 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: akataria@...are.com
Cc: Chris Snook <chris.snook@...il.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Reduce the default HZ value
> > As a side note Red Hat ships runtime configurable tick behaviour in RHEL
> > these days. HZ is fixed but the ticks can be bunched up. That was done as
> > a quick fix to keep stuff portable but its a lot more sensible than
> > randomly messing with the HZ value and its not much code either.
> >
> Hi Alan,
>
> I guess you are talking about the tick_divider patch ?
> And that's still same as reducing the HZ value only that it can be done
> dynamically (boot time), right ?
Yes - which has the advantage that you can select different behaviours
rather than distributions having to build with HZ=1000 either for
compatibility or responsiveness can still allow users to drop to a lower
HZ value if doing stuff like HPC.
Basically it removes the need to argue about it at build time and lets
the user decide.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists