[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090705202503.0914.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 20:31:02 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] add buffer cache information to show_free_areas()
> On Sun, Jul 05, 2009 at 05:24:07PM +0800, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > Subject: [PATCH] add buffer cache information to show_free_areas()
> >
> > When administrator analysis memory shortage reason from OOM log, They
> > often need to know rest number of cache like pages.
>
> nr_blockdev_pages() pages are also accounted in NR_FILE_PAGES.
Yes, I know.
> > Then, show_free_areas() shouldn't only display page cache, but also it
> > should display buffer cache.
>
> So if we are to add this, I'd suggest to put it close to the total
> pagecache line:
>
> printk("%ld total pagecache pages\n", global_page_state(NR_FILE_PAGES));
> + printk("%ld blkdev pagecache pages\n", nr_blockdev_pages());
but this is intensional. May I explain why I choose non verbose area?
In typical workload, buffer-pages doesn't consume so many pages. then
I feel that your idea is too verbose output. In addition, if buffer-pages are much,
Administrator want to know other I/O related vmstat at the same time.
Then, I choose current position.
Thanks.
>
> Thanks,
> Fengguang
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> > mm/page_alloc.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> > @@ -2118,7 +2118,7 @@ void show_free_areas(void)
> > printk("Active_anon:%lu active_file:%lu inactive_anon:%lu\n"
> > " inactive_file:%lu"
> > " unevictable:%lu"
> > - " dirty:%lu writeback:%lu unstable:%lu\n"
> > + " dirty:%lu writeback:%lu buffer:%lu unstable:%lu\n"
> > " free:%lu slab_reclaimable:%lu slab_unreclaimable:%lu\n"
> > " mapped:%lu pagetables:%lu bounce:%lu\n",
> > global_page_state(NR_ACTIVE_ANON),
> > @@ -2128,6 +2128,7 @@ void show_free_areas(void)
> > global_page_state(NR_UNEVICTABLE),
> > global_page_state(NR_FILE_DIRTY),
> > global_page_state(NR_WRITEBACK),
> > + K(nr_blockdev_pages()),
> > global_page_state(NR_UNSTABLE_NFS),
> > global_page_state(NR_FREE_PAGES),
> > global_page_state(NR_SLAB_RECLAIMABLE),
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists