linux-kernel - Re: linux-arm-kernel useless for development (was Re: Your message to Linux-arm-kernel awaits moderator approval)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090806141536.5fdf8770@nij0285>
Date:	Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:15:36 +0200
From:	Erik Mouw <mouw@...linux.org>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Russell King <rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-arm-kernel useless for development (was Re: Your message
 to Linux-arm-kernel awaits moderator approval)

On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:31:04 +0200
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> wrote:

> Actually I'm subscribed, but I still have far too many problems.
> 
> Due to the approval process, I don't think you'll ever have a spammer
> on lakml... can the mail size + #of people in to/cc list simply be
> increased to lkml levels?

Spammers indeed stand no chance on lakml, but that was not the main
reason to make it a closed list.

Max mail size is on 100k. That should be enough, patches larger
than that should have been broken up anyway. I just increased the
number of people in the CC list from 15 to 30 so that should resolve
most of the recipients issues. When the CC list gets larger than that,
it's usually a flamewar anyway ;-)

Regards,

Erik

-- 
Erik Mouw -- mouw@...linux.org
GPG key fingerprint: D6AC 7F15 A26E C5C4 62E0  4A58 FCF9 551C 9B48 B68D

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)