[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090910204431.GA20993@lst.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:44:31 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, drepper@...hat.com,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, kyle@...artin.ca
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/16] implement posix O_SYNC and O_DSYNC semantics
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 04:43:35PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >
> > Doesn't matter, we check early in the open path that __O_SYNC is only
> > set together with O_SYNC.
>
> Right, but (file->f_flags & O_SYNC) will be non-zero even if only the
> O_DSYNC flag is set.
Thanks, corrected.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists