linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] agp/intel: remove restore in resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:42:52 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com, stable@...nel.org,
	stern@...land.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] agp/intel: remove restore in resume

On Fri,  4 Sep 2009 09:43:34 +0800
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com> wrote:

> As early pci resume has already restored config for host
> bridge and graphics device, don't need to restore it again,
> which might cause problem on some chips, like 845G tested by
> Alan Stern.
> 
> Cc: Stable Team <stable@...nel.org>
> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>

Why were these patches cc'ed to stable@...nel.org?  There's nothing in
the changelog which explains why the problem which is being fixed is
sufficiently serious to warrant backporting the patch.

Was there a [patch 3/3]?  I didn't receive it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/