[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090911010342.GA6819@zhen-devel.sh.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:03:42 +0800
From: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...nel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] agp/intel: remove restore in resume
On 2009.09.10 13:42:52 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2009 09:43:34 +0800
> Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> > As early pci resume has already restored config for host
> > bridge and graphics device, don't need to restore it again,
> > which might cause problem on some chips, like 845G tested by
> > Alan Stern.
> >
> > Cc: Stable Team <stable@...nel.org>
> > Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Why were these patches cc'ed to stable@...nel.org? There's nothing in
> the changelog which explains why the problem which is being fixed is
> sufficiently serious to warrant backporting the patch.
Sorry, Andrew. I wasn't awared that an earlier version of this patch
has already been merged, and this patch fixed resume issue on Alan's
845G, which was discussed on linux-pm list, I should have made more
clear note about that. We've also seen other resume failure bugs, which
might be relate to this one. So I think it should be fine for stable.
>
> Was there a [patch 3/3]? I didn't receive it.
sorry, my mistake, the 3/3 commit on my tree is not ready to send,
forget to make git format-patch happy.
--
Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd.
$gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4D781827
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists