[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4ABA3321.9090503@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 17:39:29 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
CC: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: [perf] Finding uninstalled modules Was Re: mailing
list for trace users
On 09/23/2009 05:09 PM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
>> Mine says:
>>
>> kernel/arch/x86/kvm/kvm.ko:
>> kernel/arch/x86/kvm/kvm-intel.ko: kernel/arch/x86/kvm/kvm.ko
>>
>> Which is reasonable for /lib/modules/2.6.31, not for a source directory.
>>
> Yup, there's the problem. The code assumes that the path to modules.dep
> and the path stored in modules.dep will agree.
>
> Wants some robustification.
>
The trace shows modules.dep was picked up from /lib/modules/2.6.31, so
if it continued that and picked up the modules from the same place,
everything would work. Why does it try to pick up the modules from cwd?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists