[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091029162145.GM10555@parisc-linux.org>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:21:45 -0600
From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
To: Tejun Heo <teheo@...e.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Sysfs: Allow directories to be populated
dynamically
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 05:20:00PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> This will increase the size of struct sysfs_dirent by three pointers
> which is considerable. Bloating the size of sysfs_dirent can waste
> large amount of memory on machines with a lot of disks.
No it won't. It's in a union with sysfs_inode_attrs which contains a
struct iattr, which is at least 52 bytes.
> The implementation looks quite scary to me. Is this the only way to
> do this? It it because trying to create individual entries for msix
> will end up creating too many sysfs entries? If so, how many are we
> talking about?
While that's the original motivation, shrinking the amount of memory
taken by sysfs overall is a worthwhile achievement, don't you think?
--
Matthew Wilcox Intel Open Source Technology Centre
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists