[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100126030338.GC2739@linux-sh.org>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 12:03:38 +0900
From: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ftrace: unify arch_syscall_addr() implementations
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 09:36:17AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> [ Added Heiko Carstens and Paul Mundt to Cc ]
>
> On Fri, 2010-01-22 at 08:43 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > also, does the arch_syscall_addr() even really need to be weak ? or can
> > we assume that everyone is going to be sane and do it the same way ...
> >
> > Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.txt | 6 +++++-
> > arch/s390/kernel/ftrace.c | 10 ----------
> > arch/sh/kernel/ftrace.c | 9 ---------
> > arch/sparc/kernel/ftrace.c | 11 -----------
> > arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c | 10 ----------
> > include/linux/ftrace.h | 6 ++++++
> > kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 6 +++++
>
> Actually for this patch to be accepted, we need to get the acks from the
> maintainers of s390, sh, and sparc since it touches their code. Doesn't
> matter if it is just removing duplicate code. Still need their acks.
>
Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists