[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100210111115.GA8376@ioremap.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2010 14:11:15 +0300
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <zbr@...emap.net>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [WTF] ... is going on with current->fs->{root,mnt} accesses in pohmelfs
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 11:00:11AM +0000, Al Viro (viro@...IV.linux.org.uk) wrote:
> > > To mountpoint or to fs root? And what's going on with d_find_alias()?
> >
> > To root if it happend to be under mountpoint.
>
> HUH? How the hell can root of filesystem be under the mountpoint of
> that filesystem? What are you talking about?
Let me guess... Mmmm, it was in the yesterday newspaper, I remember.
Maybe when we chroot somewhere. I meant not mounted fs root, but
thread's root.
> > > AFAICS, you are doing that for regular files as well as directories,
> > > and you do support link(2) in there, so dentry (and path) obtained from
> > > that will be random.
> >
> > Not exactly random, but can change.
> > Links support is rather subtle because of that, yes.
> >
> > Plan was to add external attribute or increase inode size to include
> > parent name, but when I coded that it was so messy in respect of
> > renames, that was dropped.
>
> Why not use the dentries you've been given by VFS?
At writeback we do not have parents, so must find a path somehow.
--
Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists