[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100317133019.GV5768@kernel.dk>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:30:19 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, czoccolo@...il.com,
vgoyal@...hat.com, jmoyer@...hat.com, guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com,
alex.shi@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC]cfq-iosched: fix a kbuild regression
On Tue, Mar 16 2010, Shaohua Li wrote:
> Alex Shi reported a kbuild regression which is about 10% performance lost.
> He bisected to this commit: 3dde36ddea3e07dd025c4c1ba47edec91606fec0.
> The reason is cfqq_close() can't find close cooperator. If we store the seek
> distance to the value before the commit like below, the regression fully goes
> away. If this is too invasive, just changing the cfq_rq_close() for the
> !for_preempt is ok too.
Corrado, any objections to widening the seek threshold?
>
> Reported-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
>
> diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> index dee9d93..fcae456 100644
> --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static const int cfq_hist_divisor = 4;
> #define CFQ_HW_QUEUE_MIN (5)
> #define CFQ_SERVICE_SHIFT 12
>
> -#define CFQQ_SEEK_THR (sector_t)(8 * 100)
> +#define CFQQ_SEEK_THR (sector_t)(8 * 1024)
> #define CFQQ_SECT_THR_NONROT (sector_t)(2 * 32)
> #define CFQQ_SEEKY(cfqq) (hweight32(cfqq->seek_history) > 32/8)
>
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists