[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100611065635.GA19692@lst.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 08:56:35 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Tao Ma <tao.ma@...cle.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Joel Becker <joel.becker@...cle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ocfs2: Let ocfs2_setattr use new truncate sequence.
This looks correct, but still has the second if ATTR_SIZE block that
I commented on last time. I'd really prefer if the filesystems could
move the truncate handling into a single conditional to simplify
auditing for it and possibly splitting it out into a separate method
later.
And btw, the S_ISREG check which you only have on the first ATTR_SIZE
check is superflous, the VFS only does ATTR_SIZE calls on regular files.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists