[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100614080154.7d6a71fc@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 08:01:54 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@...il.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible code: s2disk
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 17:54:40 +0300
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:
> On (06/14/10 07:38), Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > Not sure if this simple solution is the correct one.
> >
> > it's not; the caller needs to pass in the cpu number I suspect for
> > this to be really correct....
> >
> > I just returned from family emergency travel and will take a look
> > today
> >
>
> I thought about patching
>
> ./drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c: if (nr_iowait_cpu())
> ./drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c: mult += 10 *
> nr_iowait_cpu(); ./kernel/time/tick-sched.c: if
> (nr_iowait_cpu() > 0)
>
>
> decided to patch nr_iowait_cpu instead.
the bug is that it needs to be
nr_iowait_cpu(int cpu)
--
Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings,
visit http://www.lesswatts.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists