[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C56E1B1.4070805@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:18:09 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: SVM: Check for nested vmrun intercept before
emulating vmrun
On 08/02/2010 05:46 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> This patch lets the nested vmrun fail if the L1 hypervisor
> has not intercepted vmrun. This fixes the "vmrun intercept
> check" unit test.
> +
> static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> {
> struct vmcb *nested_vmcb;
> @@ -2029,6 +2037,17 @@ static bool nested_svm_vmrun(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> if (!nested_vmcb)
> return false;
>
> + if (!nested_vmcb_checks(nested_vmcb)) {
> + nested_vmcb->control.exit_code = SVM_EXIT_ERR;
> + nested_vmcb->control.exit_code_hi = 0;
> + nested_vmcb->control.exit_info_1 = 0;
> + nested_vmcb->control.exit_info_2 = 0;
> +
> + nested_svm_unmap(page);
> +
> + return false;
> + }
> +
Don't you have to transfer an injected event to exitintinfo?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists