[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4C572BA1.3060206@zytor.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:33:37 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Thiago Farina <tfransosi@...il.com>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86, setup: reorgize the early_console_setup
On 08/02/2010 12:09 PM, Thiago Farina wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 3:27 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>> On 08/02/2010 10:56 AM, Thiago Farina wrote:
>>>
>>> These to functions above can be fairly simplified by writting as:
>>>
>>> static bool inline is_hex_digit(int c) {
>>> return (c >= '0' && c <= '9') ||
>>> (c >= 'A' && c <= 'F') ||
>>> (c >= 'a' && c <= 'f');
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> a) You lose the isdigit() functionality, which is useful on its own.
>> b) Does this enahance readability in any way?
>> c) Your proposed renaming is nonstandard.
>>
>
> What about this instead?
>
> static inline bool isxdigit(int ch) {
> return (isdigit(ch) || (ch >= 'A' && ch <= 'F') || (ch >= 'a' && ch <= 'f');
> }
>
>> As such, I don't think this is a good idea.
>>
Again, I don't think it adds any readability; the compiler will produce
the same code.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists