linux-kernel - Re: Dynamic nop selection breaks boot on Geode LX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4CAA4C7D.8040006@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:51:57 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
CC:	Daniel Drake <dsd@...top.org>,
	Andres Salomon <dilinger@...ued.net>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: Dynamic nop selection breaks boot on Geode LX

On 10/04/2010 08:46 AM, Jason Baron wrote:
> 
> move arch_init_ideal_nop5 later
> 
> arch_init_ideal_nop5() was being called from setup_arch() before
> the exception table was setup. Move it later into
> alternative_instructions().
> 
> Fixes a boot hang on OLPC's XO-1 laptop based on Geode LX
> processor.
> 

This code is fundamentally toxic and needs to be scrapped completely --
it is simply broken beyond repair.

We tried exactly this type of dynamic selection before, and it doesn't
work on broken virtualizers; in particular Microsoft VirtualPC can pass
the exception test and yet fail later.

The end result is very simple: you can always use NOPL on 64 bits, you
can never use NOPL on 32 bits.

66 66 66 66 90 will always *work* (as in, it will never fail) but it's
pretty slow on older CPUs which took a hit on handle prefixes -- but it
might still be faster than a jump on those.  Thus, in your code the JMP
case will never be reached anyway.

There isn't, of course, a classic 5-byte sequence, although the sequence:

	2E 8D 75 26 00

... should work (leal %ds:0(,%esi,1),%esi).  However, 66 ... 90 is
likely to work better on modern processors (although I haven't measured it.)

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/