[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1287486167.1994.1.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:02:47 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched_rt: Removes extra checking for nr_cpus_allowed
when calling find_lowest_rq
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 16:57 +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
> sched_rt: Removes extra checking for nr_cpus_allowed when calling
> find_lowest_rq
Why repeat this subject?
> Remove the check for nr_cpus_allowed of an RT task before calling
> find_lowest_cpu() from select_task_rq_rt function. Cause
> find_lowest_cpu checks for rt.nr_cpus_allowed of a process.
> It would've been nice, if we make the check before calling
> find_lowest_cpu. But its called from other places, so keep the
> nr_cpus_allowed check into find_lowest_cpu().
That's just not explaining anything.. what can go wrong, how does this
fix it.
> Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
> ---
>
> --- linus-rc8/kernel/sched_rt.c 2010-10-15 05:26:43.000000000 +0600
> +++ rakib-rc8/kernel/sched_rt.c 2010-10-19 16:22:30.000000000 +0600
> @@ -971,8 +971,7 @@ select_task_rq_rt(struct rq *rq, struct
> * that is just being woken and probably will have
> * cold cache anyway.
> */
> - if (unlikely(rt_task(rq->curr)) &&
> - (p->rt.nr_cpus_allowed > 1)) {
> + if (unlikely(rt_task(rq->curr))) {
> int cpu = find_lowest_rq(p);
>
> return (cpu == -1) ? task_cpu(p) : cpu;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists