linux-kernel - Re: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] sched: automated per tty task groups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTin4A61K9uW1Cns3rr3eDkWQ+KCBP8jt4M4tFQHP@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 21 Oct 2010 11:17:53 +0200
From:	Marco <mpiazza@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH] sched: automated per tty task groups

Hello, i'm a little confused about tty grouping.
The benefit in terms of latency is only due to the grouping of task
under the appropriate cgroup hierarchy?

Can this issue be solved by userspace daemon (think of libpam-systemd,
libpam-cgroup)? Perhaps tty grouping in kernel space is more
efficient.

I'm missing something?

Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/