[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4CC5B8D3020000780001EFB4@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:05:23 +0100
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...ell.com>
To: "Alexander van Heukelum" <heukelum@...tmail.fm>
Cc: "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>, <torvalds@...l.org>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@...hat.com>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Partially revert patch that encloses asm-offset.h
numbers in brackets
>>> On 25.10.10 at 16:54, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
> Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com> wrote:
>
>> Isn't this a gas bug then? Anywhere you use a plain number you
>> should also be permitted to use an expression.
>
> Whoever defined the gas assembly syntax for binutils specified that (N) as
> an
> operand defines an absolute address and N defines an immediate value.
>
> However, prefixing an expression with a unary plus works for me, so adding
> this into my patch:
>
> - s:^->\([^ ]*\) [\$$#]*\([-0-9]*\) \(.*\):#define \1 \2 /* \3 */:; \
> + s:^->\([^ ]*\) [\$$#]*\([-0-9]*\) \(.*\):#define \1 +(\2) /* \3 */:; \
>
> Does that work for you?
Alexander, you seem to be having access to a worst case system -
could you give this a try?
Thanks, Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists