[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101102222111.GA5169@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 22:21:11 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
valentin.longchamp@...l.ch, daniel@...aq.de,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, amit.kucheria@...onical.com,
xiao-lizhang@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: imx: Add mx53 support to common msl functions.
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 05:17:07PM -0500, Dinh.Nguyen@...escale.com wrote:
> static void query_silicon_parameter(void)
> {
> - void __iomem *rom = ioremap(MX51_IROM_BASE_ADDR, MX51_IROM_SIZE);
> + void __iomem *rom;
> u32 rev;
>
> + if (cpu_is_mx51())
> + rom = ioremap(MX51_IROM_BASE_ADDR, MX51_IROM_SIZE);
> + else if (cpu_is_mx53())
> + rom = ioremap(MX53_IROM_BASE_ADDR, MX53_IROM_SIZE);
else
rom is uninitialized;
I'd also suggest that the above set two variables - base and size, rather
than repeating the ioremap. If you look at the generated code, I suspect
you'll find that the above generates two ioremap calls, whereas using
variables for base and size, and having a common ioremap will reduce the
code size.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists