lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101118084257.GF26398@elte.hu>
Date:	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 09:42:57 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
	yinghai@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9 UPDATED-1] x86: Initialize 32bit logical apicid
 mapping early during boot


* Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:

> Hey, Ingo.
> 
> On 11/18/2010 09:30 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > This patch is still _WAY_ too large.
> 
> Really?  Alright, I'll split it further.

This is a very sensitive area of code that tends to blow up in nasty ways. So when 
we do changes here we want them super-finegrained. If you split it up into 30 
reasonable patches - no problem at all. (here up to 5 would suffice i think)

Yinghai used to have this too big patches illness too.

> > Also, these:
> > 
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> >> +#endif
> > 
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> >> +#endif
> > 
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> >> +#endif
> > 
> >> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
> >> +#endif
> > 
> > Are rather ugly.
> 
> Yeah, what they do is ugly.  It gets less uglier after the patchset.
> I'll see if some of them can be dropped but I don't think putting them
> inside ifdef'd inline functions necessarily improves things.  It often
> just makes things more difficult to follow.

Can we remove them? Or does it make any sense on the 64-bit side?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ